N	plete response were not submitted to APR, but received       additional bra
1	f 27 patients       candidate for an APR, the sphincter was preserved, as i
2	acral resection was common following APR. There was a high       incidence 
3	ectal reconstruction (TAR) following APR in the past       (n = 6); Patient
4	ded in any group. Laparoscopic       APR is associated with a 50 per cent r
5	s       treated by conventional open APR by the same surgeon during the sam
6	r of the midrectum treated by SSR or APR, recurrence and survival rates are
7	ars after abdominoperineal resection (APR). We report this case to show the
8	rocedure, abdominoperineal resection (APR) with       or without sacral res
9	tion with abdominoperineal resection (APR) for lesions       too distal to 
10	  local control rate without salvage APR is 30% or less in the first 20  pa
11	plete response were not submitted to APR, but received       additional bra