N	ation compared with abdominoperineal resection because it       provides go
1	ound 16 years after abdominoperineal resection (APR). We report this case t
2	in pigments, and an abdominoperineal resection was performed, the histology
3	n alternative to an abdominoperineal resection in selected       patients. 
4	plication following abdominoperineal resection. The aim of the study was to
5	ROUND: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (LAPR) has not been fully ev
6	 resection or abdominoperineal       resection for primary adenocarcinoma o
7	l       excision or abdominoperineal resection of early stage rectal cancer
8	local resection or  abdominoperineal resection) and unilateral or bilateral
9	d to reduce salvage abdominoperineal resection (Nigro 1989; Miller 1991; Si
10	nts underwent       abdominoperineal resection and 52% anterior resection. 
11	ical resection with abdominoperineal resection with adjuvant       chemothe
12	rmerly treated with abdominoperineal resection.   However, patients are now
13	ation compared with abdominoperineal resection because it       provides go