|
Romero, E. & Soria, B., (2005), "Why metaphor
should not be considered implicatures"
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to show that for
metaphor to be considered as a case of implicature, the notion of
implicature should change until a point in which the notion is
unrecognisable. What is more, it ends up having the properties that
usually are attributed to what is said. Thus, in the theoretical
explanation of how metaphors work, the result of metaphoric
interpretation is more naturally located in what is said.
Key Words: |
Metaphor, what is said, implicature, cancelability, nondetachability,
truth conditions |
Subjects: |
Linguistics: Semantics
Linguistics: Pragmatics
Philosohphy: Philosophy of language
|
Notes: |
A version of this paper was presented in ECAP'05,
Lisboa. |
Deposited by: |
Belén Soria
on
21/10/2005 |
|